You’ve probably heard different opinions and views on this
subject. If you’re a medical
transcriptionist you may even be concerned about voice recognition
taking over your career… and you’re not alone. Let’s
dig a bit deeper into voice recognition. As you already know, doctors
are busy people. This is never more obvious then when they’re
dictating their notes. It’s understandable they’re busy,
and as their Medial
Billings, I can surely forgive them but will the latest voice
recognition software be as forgiving as me? Not likely. As a transcriptionist
you will have typed through background noise, patients moaning,
doctors eating their lunch, personal conversations (oops they forgot
the recorder was on)
and other incomprehensible noise. Not to mention, ESL doctors with
heavy accents and very tired ER doctors after a long shift! At this
time there is no voice recognition software which can handle this
type of voice recognition. It is impossible for the software to
determine actual speech from mistakes in conversation, background
noise, heavy accents, etc. So what does this mean for our future?
Rumors of MTs being out of r a job have been around
long before I became an MT. Eight years later, there are still no
real advances in this field. Can voice recognition ever replace
transcriptionists?
Sure it can.If a doctor is willing to sit down and take the sufficient
time to train his voice recognition software to recognize his voice
and speech patterns (this takes time and is not done automatically),
yes it is possible.If the doctor thereafter dictates very clearly,
using proper punctuation in his speech.